Feedback given on the human resources plan
UC must attend to salary, incentive pay issues
The following letter was
sent from the UC Davis campus to Lubbe Levin, UC assistant vice president for human
resources, regarding feedback on the Human Resources Management
Initiatives.
Based on our many town hall information sessions, the Davis
campus continues to support the current Human Resources Management
Initiatives proposal.
The major themes that have come out of our campus presentations have
stressed the virtues of:
- Combining the separate programs into one;
- Delegation of authority to the campus to design programs
that respond to employee and management needs;
- Expanding training and development programs (e.g., funding, courses
and release time)--the real key to implementing the parts of the HRMI
proposal that rely on supervisor and manager competencies;
- Streamlining the grievance policy, utilizing expedited
arbitrations, training and appointing independent reviewers and using a
campus mediation service;
- Support for strengthening sections on performance appraisal,
compensation and development to encourage staff and academic manager
accountability at all levels within the organization;
- Ongoing review of the incentive program to ensure that it
can be administered fairly, truly meet our needs and satisfy the
expectations of management and our employees (see below);
- Establishing an open and continuous review of labor market salary
studies; and
- Redesigning the classification system to reduce titles,
broadband certain classes and simplify the classification process.
On the cautionary, sometimes negative side:
- There is virtually no support for expanding the incentive
program until it is absolutely clear that we have established a base
salary program that will assure everyone of competitive
salaries--salaries that will ensure our being able to hire and retain
the best employees.
- Similarly, we must assure that our geographical market
areas are realistic, i.e., that when we have to recruit statewide for a
particular position, the geographical market area should be statewide,
also.
Finally, we propose a number of technical revisions (see
attached).
It is our intent that when the HRMI proposal is approved, we
will begin open discussion of campus and UC Davis Medical Center
implementation procedures to ensure input into how we plan to
administer the policies. We view this process as critical to
establishing both understanding and ownership of the policies.
Although the new HRMI policies will become effective on July
1, 1996, we expect to continue to collaborate with UC Office of the
President to review and revise the policies as we gain experience. The
widespread review at UC Davis demonstrated our continuing commitment to
full participation in the design of our policies.
We will remain open,
and where necessary, recommend future revisions. I will close by
repeating the most important concern we've heard. The salary program
and incentive pay plan deserve our special attention.
We must actively
demonstrate our commitment to competitive base salaries. We cannot
reduce future annual salary programs as a way of increasing the funding
for the incentive plan until we have competitive base salaries.
Competitive base salaries are key to rewarding employees, to remaining
competitive and to retaining our current valued staff. Thank you for
the opportunity to comment.
Dennis Shimek Associate Vice Chancellor for
Human Resources and Risk Management